Sunday, July 12, 2015

Suggested readings for July 12, 2015

Food for thought … please read and digest carefully … Share if you wish, either this blog posting or any of the individual articles. I say this because that is how ideas spread, by individuals sharing their thoughts with others. And if one shares with two who each share with two, who in turn each share with two, etc. … it rapidly boggles the mind how that universe expands.

 

If Iran goes nuclear, what are the options? Interesting view point here. One of the possible scenarios has been my nightmare for many years.

Ruby Slippers Reward - my bet is that person who has them wouldn't take a lot more than $1mil for them ... and he or she keeps them real close.

Greece should sue the bank that helped Greece to hide debt - I suppose there is some liability there for Goldman-Sachs ... in that they were perpetrating a fraud against the EU members ...but for Greece to sue? Strikes me as something the Europeans would think of ... helping someone maintain their addiction to money is wrong and the addict bears no responsibility for their habit .... NOT

Burning Obama in effigy ... yeah, I suppose you can make a deal with a lynch mob.

Iranians chanting death to America ... in case you really think the Iranian government is just going stop researching an A-bomb.

Puerto Rico a state? I don't have a problem with that, other than it will give the Democrats three to five more seats or so in Congress. Having said that, this is less about representation and more about getting benefits for Puerto Ricans ... that I do have a problem with. It would seem that with all the places the Democrats are in control, you would think you would find one success of a social program that has come in on time and under budget.

Russia's Weimar Dilemma - Food for thought ... and an interesting and hopeful article.

Henry V's speech to the troops ... Billy Shakespeare ... you done good putting these words in the mouth of an English king.

Atheists steal concept of rights - Eh-yup ... pretty much true. I know atheists and humanists can't come to grips with why any God (singular) would allow bad things to good people ... I keep telling them what this article says (I thought this long before I read the piece, like maybe 60 years). God "lets" evil and bad things happen to teach us what evil and bad things are. Humans being rather slow on the pick up times, you have to do a show-and-tell sometimes to get them to understand. It is not in our DNA, folks, it is in our experience.

On the Wrong Side of God, Evolution and Humanity - another treatise on God and rights and who grants what. Food for thought ... you really ought to consider it.

For those who think man's efforts really are either contributing to or will stop global climate change ... consider this. Think, this could very well happen tomorrow, or next week, or next month or next year or even years from now ... do really think humans are just as powerful as volcanoes.

Secrets of Disneyland at 60 ... sigh, the original Disneyland ... really one of my most favorite places (despite being the site of so many mixed memories in my love life). It truly can be a "Magic Kingdom", although it has been almost 45 years since I last visited it. I did go to Disney World a few times (really, I like DL more that DW)

Obama: Incompetence and Corruption - I will let this commentary stand on its own merits - which are legend. How Americans can dismiss this and ignore it is beyound my ken.

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Slavery: Face the reality of it

 

First and foremost: It still exists today, even in the United States and other “enlightened” countries. Whether it is sex slaves held by criminal gangs or illegal immigrant laborers forced to pay off their passage into the US (and other countries), involuntary servitude exists.

That is what slavery is: INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE. Now, you can parse that to say that indentured slavery is not as bad as chattel slavery or forced labor from prisoners sold into servitude is not as bad as chattel slavery but you are only deluding yourself.

Indentured servants, white or black, in the 17th Century had no rights and the first Africans to arrive in the English colonies were exactly that: indentured servants. Don’t try to parse it or excuse it, because that is the truth. However, it didn’t last long before English planters changed the contract for Africans to what people now associate with true slavery.

But you all have to understand, slavery has been endemic in every culture on the planet, white, black, yellow, red or tan; Europe, Africa, Asia, Polynesia, the Americas. Again, if you don’t realize that and try to deny it and claim that in the Americas it was uniquely a European practice, then you truly are ignorant of history.

Native American tribes from the Incas to the Mayas to Aztecs to the Apaches (and all the other plains Indians) to the Cherokee to the Iroquois all practiced slavery. If you don’t want to admit that, then you have a major problem.

So, African-Americans, you are not unique … especially today’s African-Americans, many of whom, like a lot of the other immigrants in the US, can’t trace their lineage back to the time of slavery in the US.

So, when the “liberals” and “progressives” in this country try it to drive more wedges between the various ethnic communities in the US, the slavery gambit is false, or at least should be discarded.

Yes, the American Civil War was fought pretty much on the basis of whether the nation would remain half slave and half free, BUT that was not the only issue. The right of secession was hotly debated and many states – North and South – had threatened to secede in the four-score years that led up to the war. The Civil War ended not only the debate over slavery but also over the right of secession. The Federal Government said, by force of arms, neither was going happen. There was a host of other issues that divided the regions and created tensions, and all of those also contributed. So, yes, the war was about slavery, but, no, that was not the only issue.

Yes, African-Americans have faced centuries of discrimination based on race in North America, but then so have other ethnicities … if you don’t know and understand that, then you are part of the problem today, where people are hyperventilating over all things Confederate. Don’t believe me? Do a little research about the Chinese imported to build the West, or the Irish prisoners sold to English plantations in the Caribbean and the East Coast of what now is the U.S. and Canada in the 1600s. Research the lives of Irish immigrants in the early 19th Century. Don’t pooh-pooh it as something different, it wasn’t … for most of them it was involuntary servitude, and that means slavery. I supposedly had an ancestor who was one of those Irish slaves sent to Massachusetts when he was only 15. He would later win his freedom fighting against the natives and lost his life finally in one battle in the 1690s.

Sorry, folks, this is the 21st Century and people left and right, black and white, North and South have got to understand that the Civil War IS OVER. GET OVER IT.

As for the Confederacy … have we lost our freaking minds? What is all this hyperventilating about the Confederate flags and monuments, etc.? Good grief, people, when the soldiers who actually fought in the bloody campaigns – brother against brother, life-long friend against life-long friend, American against American – were able to reconcile and come to grips with the fact that we are all Americans, are we unable to the same?

The Union and Confederate veterans long ago made peace with one another, with respect and dignity and honor for each other’s valor, sacrifice and honor. Can we do no less?

So stop these silly vendettas against all things Confederate. It is unbecoming of Americans to allow ourselves to be played like marionettes to divide us and set us against ourselves.

Slavery is over. Jim Crow is over. Racism always will exist as long as we sub-divide ourselves into separate ethnic or religious identities. The only way that will stop is when we realize that we are all Americans … and we share that and the fact that we are all humans. At least do that to pay homage to those brave men who sacrificed so much to give us our liberties and freedoms.

Suggested Readings for July 11, 2015

Clinton plans to boost wages - I wish people understood that only in a command economy does a president have the power to set wages. That is another word for dictatorship. And if she plans to use tax policies, well, the IRS can have more fun as the tax code gets even harder to figure out.

Russian soldiers face AWOL charges for refusing to volunteer for duty in Ukraine ... interesting development

Coyotes in Irvine, Calif. - Hey, I know that town ... back when it was just orange groves, eucalyptus trees and truck farms, I used to ride my bike all around there. The groves and fields are gone now - pavement, apartments, schools, shopping centers where high chaparral used reign in the hills just in from the Pacific.  Never did see one there, but I have seen one here in Maine ... it was pretty mangy looking.

Krugman-Moore Economic Debate (that went unreported, basically) - Paul Krugman, economic guru of the left, can be pretty dumb sometimes.

Glad the flag is gone - Mr. Jackson makes good points, but the thing I like best is that he turns away from all the hatred now being spewed about all things Confederate and asks why are people so mired in the past and then looks to the need to get over it, heal and move on into the future.

Confederate flag is anti-American - well, I disagree. It is part of being an American and all the hate and other bovine scatology being spewed today seem to forget that it represents one side of a family dispute that pitted brother against brother, father against son, family against family. There is a quote buried in the story that the author highlights from Gen. Grant ... take the quote in its whole context and totality, not just a snippet ... and yes, Grant was right. Granted … some of the symbols have been expropriated by nefarious and ugly types, but the same could be said about so many things in the U.S. You can’t just flush history down the Orwell’s memory chute into non-existence. You should study it, learn from it and appreciate what our forefathers who lived through it went through.

Gen. Odierno on realigning troops to Europe - Cold War redux - The politicians (on both sides) seem to think the military can keep pulling rabbits out of their hats.

Pope excoriates capitalism - Well, yes, there is much to criticize in the way capitalism is practiced around the world, especially in the United States, where the government has used tax policies, regulations and other methods to warp the forces that make capitalism the tide that raises all boats. Still, as I have since I was a teenager, I pose one question: And your better system is what? Sorry, but the from-each-to-each system has repeatedly demonstrated through out man's long history that it just doesn't work. Needs are undefined, and therefore limitless, and ability is indeed a very limited resource ... there is no way the latter can meet the former's demands.

Operation Jade Helm: An absolute complete and utter Pentagon disaster .... before it even starts. The military, unfortunately, usually shoots itself in the foot when it comes to Public Affairs, and this is no exception. I have known and lived among special operators and I know their obsession with secrecy, but we used to joke when I lived next to Fort Bragg, NC, that when you saw a wiry bearded guy in gym shorts running with a big old ALICE pack on his back through the neighborhood, you could pretty well bank on the fact that he was Army Delta Force.

It is all the South's fault - This is a typical piece of progressive crap ... Sorry, you can't absolve the North of its guilt. Hail Charleston! Hail Boston! Who stinketh the most? Line from the musical 1776.

Next "Confederate" Fight - folks this is getting out of hand. It is stupid ... (see related blog on my blog about Slavery - the reality

Iran cheating? And you thought it couldn't happen.

Friday, July 10, 2015

Reading list for July 10, 2015

Illegal alien crimes and such - It really doesn't matter who is president, the federal government has been falling down on the job of enforcing the law for a long time. It just seems worse now.

Democrat politicians abandon support of sanctuary cities - Gee, illegal immigrants, they are your fair weather friends.  Seriously, though, the federal government should enforce the damn law, period.

FBI says oops - Dylann Roof bought gun due to clerical err. Actually, the FBI couldn't do its job in the time allotted ... so Roof still got the gun "legally"

Trump has a gun license - Big Harry Deal - NBC reporter doesn't get it

Omar Sharif dies at 83 ... He was one of my all-time favorite actors

Iran accused P5+1 of reneging ... I bet that Obama/Kerry don't have the cojones to admit that the agreement is bad, ain't gonna happen, and walk away.

Kerry says US maybe will walk away ... I call scatology

The NY Times bars Cruz biography from listing - claims bulk purchases - The NYT rides again

House votes down cemetery flag ban - Good Grief Democrats, your hypocrisy stinks. Look, you may see the various confederate flags as racist ( and all the other things you want to hang on it) but it is also history. You just don't stuff history down Orwell's memory hole. Secondly, to those who have actually studied the war between the states, it also represents bravery and courage and, yes, honor, by thousands of men who fought for a cause they believed in. As wrong as the cause may appear now, you can still honor that valor.

Memphis wants to dig up Bedford Forrest and wife - This folks is taking the current politically correct hysteria beyond the pale. There is stupid, there is Stupid and then there is STUPID ... and this falls in the latter category. You don't like that? Get over it.

NASA picks astronauts to crew first commercial flights - Like this is way, way overdue and we should be already flying again already. Mom, I know you are watching out for these boys and girl.

Unanswered questions in the LBGT wars - Actually, I think these questions are valid ... and have not been answered in the "debate" over gay marriage.

Gay couples qualify for federal benefits - This folks is what it really was all about - money, benefits - not love, not enduring commitment ... money, greed and a narcissistic need for social approval.

Republic? Can we keep it? - Interesting commentary. Food for thought. I might not be as strident, but I can agree with the larger points.

US tech edge wanes - This commentary makes very salient and cogent points, particularly about the absence of leadership and imagination over the last six years.

Unity Island - yet another example of our political correctness run amok

Food for thought: Is Sanders (an avowed socialist) the future of the Democrat Party? Has no one learned anything at all from the experiences of the 20th Century?

Distributed lethality - New Navy jargon ... it still comes down to logistics, logistics and logistics.

Obama Administration circumvents Hobby Lobby decision on birth control - it all comes back to "free" health care (free contraception, etc.) ... People, nothing in life is free, period. Get over it.

Ban husband and wife - the assault on the language continues

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Suggested reading list for July 9, 2015

This is new to my blog and I hope I can keep it up. It is meant to be a list of various stories I have read this day, and invite you to read as well. I hope they are illuminating views and provide food for thought. It will probably prove to be an eclectic collection.

P5+1 v Iran Talks ... the West loses

National Military Strategy ... an interesting backgrounder on priorities

Six most powerful armies of all time - interesting and accurate history review

Housing segregation - Washington Post - A step too far ... will we start assigning homes by race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, next

The fate of progressive socialism ... Mr. West has a point

Looking back - Dr. Sowell always provides good reading, even at being 85

Liberalism and capitalism - an interesting take on the dichotomy

A backgrounder to the coming South China Sea arms race

Government shutdown - oh Lord, the shoe is on the other foot ... and it still is the GOP's fault

World Civilizations - sans the Americas - you probably need to watch several times to get the full impact

ISIS shock troops - this really isn't a secret - those who are willing to die for a cause are more likely to win than those who are just willing to kill for a cause.

Title X - Family Planning - Question: Was it ever really a function of the federal government to provide?

Hillary Clinton's E-mails - When will Americans realize she is just a lying witch

Sanctuary Cities - leave it to the Beeb for an explainer

Friday, June 26, 2015

The Supremes miss the boat

You have got to hand it to the Supreme Court of the United States: They probably have done more damage to the country than they realize.

In two days, in my opinion (and one shared by many people), the justices in split decisions have done considerable damage to the rule of law in the United States.

Granted, I am not saying that the justices don’t have that power, because they do, and however wrong I, or anyone else, may think their reasoning and conclusions may be, what they say is how the law is supposed to be interpreted and applied in the United States. That is the compact we live under. I don’t have to like it. You don’t have to like it.

But love or hate the decisions they make we have to accept them as the new rules that govern the nation (at least until the political process can come up with a new way someway to interpret the compact that stands the scrutiny of the justices). If you don’t like that, then move to another country.

Now, having said all that, I think the Court’s rulings on both the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and on “gay” marriage are faulty. Both of them for basically the same reason: They chose to redefine words with established definitions.

To some people this may not seem to be a big deal, but in the realm of the law, its rules live and die on definitions. How words are defined is established by tradition and precedent, and in both these cases the concurring justices chose essentially to say that neither tradition nor precedent was enough to warrant not changing the definitions.

Now, liberals and progressives will tell you this is as it should be because words evolve, the language evolves and over time things mean differently than they did before. Only in these cases, that really is not the situation. The justices just decided it was.

For example: the word “state” in the context of the U.S. Constitution and Congressional legislation has a pretty specific meaning that has been held for roughly 228 years. That definition is no longer valid. When legislation or regulatory rules are made now, rather than meaning just the political subdivision of US called the “state” (of which there are 50 of them), the word now means either the states (in the traditional sense) or the federal government, depending on how you want to interpret it in the political/social context.

I understand the argument that ruling the PP&ACA (Obamacare) would have adversely impacted millions of Americans and I imagine that played a significant role in the thinking of the justices. The court is loath to play bull in the china shop with the U.S. economy and usually seeks ways to avoid doing it. Of course, the court could have done as it did 30+ years ago with the bankruptcy code and stayed striking it down in Toto and told Congress it had six months to fix the problem. But that would not have served the ends of those on the liberal end of the court whose political view of the world is that role of the government is expansive and such things such as health care are a right (wrong … but that is an argument for another day).

The justices did the same thing with granting equal rights to same sex marriages.

Look, I have no problem granting two people of the same sex who wish to enter into a contractual relationship (which, legally, is all “marriage” is) and receiving government benefits equal to those granted “married” couples. No problem whatsoever. But you have to recognize that this really isn’t about people loving each other or living together; it is about those benefits. All the rest really is just window dressing.

Granted, it is an effort by a minority of our population trying legislate social acceptance of behavior which is, by any estimation, a tad bit on the abnormal side and in most cultures is considered something other than acceptable behavior. In some it may be tolerated more than others but pretty much universally it is considered aberrant.

So, the justices decided, based pretty much on a loud and orchestrated campaign of political correctness, to say that such pairings had right to be called “marriages” and were indeed a constitutional right (S0 that they had to be recognized in all 50 states). In essence, they redefined the millennia old meaning of a word in almost all cultures and religions to fit what they thought was correct in our evolving world.

The court, however, was correct in saying what is a contractual right in one state has to be in all states. So, in that sense, they did do something right.

To me, at this junction, I don’t have a dog in this fight. My objection is to the laisse faire playing with the language. Now, I know this is what lawyers and judges do all the time and it is what they get paid to do. Doesn’t mean I have to like it.

I see it as an assault on the rule of law, for remember the law hinges on words and how they are defined. Start changing the definitions and you tear at the foundations of the law. And if people can change definitions at will, then we become a nation of men and not law, as the old saying goes.

In one footnote, I would say that this ruling opens the door to polygamy becoming a constitutional right. You might say “nah, never happen”, but 20 years ago people were saying the same thing about gay marriage.

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

What price freedom?

I guess it has begun, the last step in the Cycle of Democracy.

For those unfamiliar with the concept, it says this:

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government.  It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury.

"From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.  These nations have progressed through this sequence:

"From bondage to spiritual faith;
from spiritual faith to great courage;
from courage to liberty;
from liberty to abundance;
from abundance to selfishness;
from selfishness to apathy;
from apathy to dependence;
from dependency back again into bondage."

This concept is anywhere from 75 to 200 years old (depending one who you want to attribute it to), but it is quite true.

And the first steps into bondage are the losses of freedom of speech and freedom of conscience. Both those freedoms seem in much danger these days as we watch the daily news.

Maybe it is a case of Chicken Little or seeing ghosts in the shadows but to me it appears that the rule of law is collapsing and the rule of man and the mob is rising in the United States. The U.S., it appears, is rapidly de-evolving into the Dis-United States. My feeling is that it only is a matter of time until widespread violence breaks out as various “aggrieved” factions take the law into their own hands.

Am I being a Cassandra? I don’t know. But I do know that things have not looked so dark for the Union since the late 1960s, when the nation was riven by race riots, anti-war riots and political chicanery. The American people recoiled from that visage at the time, but I am not so sanguine to think it can happen a second time.

Granted, if you look at the statistics on violence not only in the US but around the world, believe it or not the trend lines are down and down significantly. It is not what our political leaders would have you believe or our various elites and media pundits (and sadly newscasters and reporters as well). The problem as I see it is that perception becomes reality in our wired world and that is scary.

This call to fear is the siren call of demagoguery and of the mob. It seeks to call all who can claim they are victims to action. The mantle of victimhood seems to be the flag of the day and wallowing in victimhood only leads to envy, resentment and strife.

You may not agree with this assessment, but I challenge you to prove me wrong.

The one thing that made America great was that it was a melting pot of cultures – where new immigrants brought their own spices to the stew but realized that its basis was more important than the culture they were leaving behind. I say was, because – by all indications – it is more important now to deride the basis for what was American culture.

Today, we have a smorgasbord in the US where it is pick and choose the cultural value that makes you feel good today and be offended if someone criticizes that choice.  And if you are offended,  you must demand that government punish and silence those who offend you. 

And if silencing you is not enough, then we will erase your history. How Orwellian.

It seems that the word assimilation is no longer in vogue, although it served this nation very well for two centuries. Now, it seems that everything is about how you identify yourself and whether that offends someone.

President Obama may refer to America as a mixed salad, but mixed salads don’t hang together all that well. Its separate ingredients tend to separate out into their own little levels according to their size and density. Unfortunately, that is what we are seeing today, whether it is the trashing and marginalizing traditional Anglo-Saxon, Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman concepts and values upon which the nation was formed and founded.

Of course, I can’t force you to acknowledge that truth, but that does not deny it its validity.

It is that tradition and historical values that made the United States into the City on the Hill shining its beacon to beckon people to its shore. To an extend that still holds, only the problem is various and sundry segments of both immigrants and “natives” don’t want to accept the rights and visions of right and wrong and justice that evolved from that grounding.

Whether it is five U.S. Supreme Court justices who take it upon themselves to start redefining terms in order to protect government benefits for this group or that group, or those who want to quash dissent on host of issues, or those who want to divide the country into competing tribes vying for political power and control of the government purse, or just burying history and a quest for dignity, what all of them apparently fail to grasp is that such attitudes are an assault on liberty and freedom.

If we deny freedom and liberty to others, then what is to protect others from denying it to ourselves.

Now I am only speaking for myself, and make no claim to represent anyone else, but I see many things happening in recent events that profoundly strike me as wrong.

People are claiming that health care is a right. It is not. Now, society can choose to provide health care to its members, but it is not a right that it can just be given to you. It comes at a price, as everything does. The price is something each of has to accept but apparently those who have become dependent on the largess of the society (government) have decided that it should be given to them at no cost. Unfortunately, this makes slaves of health care providers.

People are claiming that marriage is about only love and respect, but that is not really true. The debate about marriage in the United States has been over who is eligible for government benefits and largess and who is not and nothing else. Dispose of the traditional definition that basically has held for 5,000 years because it is now inconvenient and denies certain people access to those benefits.

It is time to punish those who see homosexuality, bisexuality and transgendeerisms as aberrant and not acceptable human behavior. Regardless whether or not there faith tells them that it is a sin and it is their job to avoid sin. Since they don’t accept what is perceived to be wrong, they are to be forced into celebrating it.

I have no problem with lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transwhatevers getting married, just spare me the other garbage about it being about love and commitment. It is about the desire for government largess. 

Over the millennia, government has chosen to recognize marriage, much for the same reason religion has, and that was to facilitate the perpetuation of the species and the society. And, biologically among humans, it is impossible for two members of the same sex to reproduce. Deny that, and you really are denying reality. So, I will respect your freedom to love and associate with whomever you choose, if you will respect my freedom to view homosexuality as something other than normal.

And then there is the effort to crush racism and “hate” speech and symbols. Well, folks, let me let you in a little secret: As long as we identify ourselves by ethnicity, race, color of our skin or what have you, we who do the identifying are racists. Call us bigots, call us what you want, but if you identify yourself as anything other than human, than you are racist.

The problem is freedom allows you to be racist … and stupid … and an idiot … and a jerk … and ignorant. If you can’t accept that, and have to be offended every time you turn around and some one says/does/wears/displays something you don’t like, then be willing to give up your own freedom as you demand to give the other person give up their freedom.

That is the price of freedom and to these old eyes, it seems that far too many people – not only in American but around the world – are unwilling to pay that price. It is freedom for me but not for  you.

It was that freedom and the freedom from the heavy hand of government dictates and interference in search of some elusive perceived social good favored by this segment or special interest group that really was responsible for the rise of the great and powerful nation that has become known as the United States of America.

Unfortunately, in our hubris, we are seeing those freedoms slip away from us. It will be sad, almost tragic, but it will be inevitable for that is the cycle of mankind and democracies and republics.

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Autumn of life

First, I want to apologize to anyone who has followed this blog in the past: I have been woefully bad about updating, having somewhat abandoned you all to make links on my Facebook page. Richard Browne on Facebook

It has been easier to post links with brief commentary there, but I have decided to take the time at this point to more fully develop my headline thesis and Facebook is inadequate vehicle for that.

Secondly, I want to apologize for the lack of links that will be in this post, but a) I am lazy and b) I am going to credit you, the reader, as one who follows the news in the United States and therefore already will be able to understand the context in which my views are made.

Now, what do I mean by “Autumn of Life”? Am I referring to my own or do I have some larger portrait to paint? The answer to both is “yes”.

I recently reached the ripe old age of 66 and with my health being as it is, I am – I must realize and acknowledge – in the “autumn” of my existence. It doesn’t mean I plan to die tomorrow or sometime soon, but it is a possibility that will come to pass. Being an old codger with a few miles under my treads does tend to give me a perspective that I once would have applied only to my digressions into my studies of history – of American, of the World, of Western and other civilizations.

So as I read today’s headlines on the internet and read through the lead stories of the day, on one hand I have been struck by an increasing sense of doom and gloom, while occasionally I see flashes that there may yet be hope.

The problem in the U.S., to me at least, is that we have become too complacent, maybe even too apathetic, about who we are as Americans and what is expected of us as Americans. Understand, that for most Americans we take for granted a lifestyle that literally few, except maybe the very wealthy, around the world really can hope to achieve. But we assume that lifestyle as a right, and don’t realize it is a privilege that has been built on the hard work and discipline of our parents, their parents, etc.

It is our expectations that are at fault now and how we fail to acknowledge the basis for the life that those expectations are built upon. Over the course of my life, I have witnessed how the elevation of our expectations in outcome were not keeping pace with the expectations of what input it would take to achieve them.

It is, of course, de rigor now to teach every child that they can achieve anything they want to and that everyone can be a success. That concept is why we now downplay competition and celebrate mere participation. We do this to promote self-esteem in our young and a belief in their abilities … even if their abilities are not up to achieving their expectations. I remember the first year I played organized baseball, I had these visions of me driving the ball up the hill above our diamond and into the parking lot. I walked 13 times (I was a little kid and had a small strike zone) and I struck out 13 times. We forgot somewhere along the line that we also have to teach our progeny that what we want often is not what we get.

I remember a saying from my youth: Aim for the stars, but be willing to accept the moon, or even low-earth orbit, if that is what your abilities will carry you to.

It is called dealing with disappointment and dealing with the reality that sometimes what you want and what you can achieve are entirely different things.

For example, when I was a young man I would have given my eyeteeth to become a line officer in the US Navy or the US Coast Guard. It didn’t happen, but not for lack of trying. Events both in and out of my control augured against me and I was disappointed in nine different attempts. What that taught me, with each of the failures I had a long the way, was to fall back, regroup, and strike out again with a new objective in mind.

Over my life, I have had some successes and, if I am honest, many failures. It was the challenge of trying to pick up the pieces after each of the failures – an some probably should be legend – and go on. It is hard. It is not easy. However, I thank my parents for for somehow endowing me with the perseverance to keep going.

The problem I see with a large part of my nation these days is that we have lost the consensus of what it means to be an American … and even if to be called an American is a worthy thing. If you read much of the politically correct debate, you begin to wonder if being an American really is worth all we go through … especially if we who believe in the old American ideal were such evil and bad people.

We have lost the consensus of what is expected of the individual adult, or the role of faith is to play in our collective lives, or what role civil and community organizations are to play in our American civilization, or what the individual roles of city, county, state and federal governments are.

The role of the individual, as perceived by those rather smart white men who wrote the constitution that underlies our current republic, was guardian of his (sorry, certain groups were excluded, although that has been for the most part correct as a matter of law) own sustenance and future. It was not the government’s role (especially not the federal or state) to make sure the individual had a roof over his head or food on the table. The role of the individual, however, was to contribute to the success of his community and to stand in its defense … and in a larger sense, to his city, county, state and nation, as part of his obligation to it. It was the individual’s obligation to uphold the law through his own actions, rather than an expectation that the government, at what ever level, to enforce the law. All were to be treated equally by that law and it applied to everyone.

That perception, unfortunately, no longer applies. If it feels good and you can get away with it, it seems that today no one has an obligation to obey or uphold the law. In addition, that extends to those whose job it is to enforce the law. If, for whatever reason, it becomes expedient not to enforce the law, or to enforce it selectively, or in some cases rewrite the law by executive fiat, those who are charged with its uniform enforcement decline to do so.

In order to satisfy the political beliefs for some, rather than take the language at its face value, it is twisted and turned into something Orwellian to behold. George Orwell’s “NewSpeak” is alive and thriving in 21st Century America.

On one hand, there are those who believe – not as American tradition holds – that in the 21st Century the rights and beliefs of the individual no longer matter but the rights of the community and democracy trump the individual with the “government” as the arbiter. We see political candidates to date making it clear that it is their position in no uncertain terms.

For example, take firearms. Well, you have the right not to own one, but does that make it right to deny someone who wants to own one to be able to do so. Just because you are scared of guns does not necessarily correlate to a need to ban guns.

The Second Amendment makes it an inalienable right of the individual to keep and bear arms, as so many of the people who debated its adoption pointed out. And it was not just for hunting, but it was survival … survival against enemies of the Republic from both within and without. The government is not giving us this right as a privilege and it doesn’t have the privilege to take it away from American individuals without showing good and just cause. It is not up to the individual to prove that he or she worthy of the right; it is up to the government to prove that he or she is unworthy of the right.

Now, I know that is not a popular position with some of our elites, particularly among our media gatekeepers and pundits and others who consider themselves to be progressive. To them, we have “evolved” past the need for individuals to be willing to step and defend not only themselves but their communities “from all enemies foreign or domestic.” (I know that oath because I have taken it many times) To them, that is what we hire police and the military for, but I would disagree with them.

In our hubris, we are letting our expectations and wants get ahead of our abilities and capabilities. In our hubris, I would posit that my country has reached the autumn of its life. Those who are familiar with the Cycle of Democracy will understand what I am saying … if you are unfamiliar with it, then I beg forgiveness and ask you to research it.

For many decades now we have let those who want desperately for everyone to succeed and raise everyone to the the same level as everyone else raise expectations without pointing out that there is no free lunch. Everything comes with a price and what you want sometimes is beyond the reach of what you can afford. That this is true does not necessarily mean that you are failure – I can attest to that, for I don’t consider myself a failure … I may not have been perfect or roaring success who achieved all his goals without effort, but that doesn’t make me a failure.

Unfortunately, we have raised at least two, if not three and possibly going on four, generations who were not taught that while all things are possible, not all things are probable. That as individuals we have to be prepared for disappointments and that we will take losses, probably in greater proportions than our gains.

I once gave a poem to my step-son and commended it to his reading. I told him to listen, hear and attend to its words, for they are good rules to live your life by. I hope it has helped him … and I would recommend everyone, especially every adolescent and young adult to read it and pay heed. It is the poem “If” by the British author and poet Rudyard Kipling. I know there are those who will immediately dismiss it, given Kipling’s provenance, but they would be wrong. It truly is an eternal lesson that knows no race, religion, creed or era.

When I look at events of recent days, I am struck by the fact that evil does walk among us … and, yes, there are evil people out there. They feed upon the envy, resentment and hate that is being fanned every day by people on the internet, in the media, and in our political leadership. We cannot escape that truth. All we can do is prepare ourselves to cope with.

How do we do that? There are a number of things we can do, but it falls to individuals and not to “society” or “government”.

First, we can endeavor to live our own lives by the only one true and universal rule of life: Treat others as we would have them treat ourselves.

Easy to say, but difficult to do. We wish we were ruled by our reason, but the truth is we are move often ruled by our emotions and our passions. Still, we must learn that it truly is better to forgive rather than to let our anger and hate eat away at us and turn us into beasts we do not recognize.

The second thing may seem at odds with the first, but it is just as true: If we want peace, then we must be prepared for war.

Whether it is war at the individual level, the community level or the national level, we must be prepared to step forward and take whatever measures we can to combat evil when it comes … and it will come. This is not something we can farm out to mercenaries in the form of police or the military. This is something each of us must take on as our personal obligation, not just to ourselves, but also to our communities, our cities, our counties, our states, territories, commonwealths and districts, our nation … and probably, by extension, to our planet.

I say these things without consideration of color, or race, or ethnicity, or economic, or social status. It doesn’t matter to me. Unfortunately, for far too many Americans, it does matter these days. No longer is it important what the law says, or what people’s actions are in accordance with those laws, it only matters what someone’s perceive gender is, or sexual orientation, or color of their skin, or whether they are rich or poor or somewhere in between. This is wrong and is part of the evil that has brought autumn to our Republic.

If you have bore with me throughout this lengthy essay, I commend you. If you agree with it, I hope it inspires you; just as I hope it it inspires you to respond with a comment if you don’t agree with me.

 

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

BBC News - US and China leaders in 'historic' greenhouse gas emissions pledge

BBC News - US and China leaders in 'historic' greenhouse gas emissions pledge



On the surface of this, this appears to be great news for those who see CO2 emissions as the biggest threat. Now, it may be - I am not a scientist, just a generalist who knows enough about a lot of things to be sufficiently skeptical about a host of threats - but having said that, after reading the article, there are a few warning bells being set of in the old skeptical brain.



First item is the agreement that the US will cut its emissions by 25 to 28 percent below 2005 levels in the next 10 years (by 2025) while China will stop increasing its emissions in those same 10 years.



Now, there are two ways of looking at that: First is that it is a plus that the Chinese have promised to do anything about their carbon emissions, now that they are the world's largest emitter of CO2, and that they have actually set a deadline on it. They second way to look at that is that the Chinese can front-load their emissions over the next 10 years (I read somewhere they are bring a coal-fired energy plant on-line at the rate of one per week).



If they did that, the Chinese could really significantly increase their energy output as well as emissions and make the reductions in the American emission rate actually superfluous in the effort to stem climate change. Of course, the Americans could pat themselves on the back, while feeling morally superior, while watching their own energy needs go unmet.



Understand, I am not a "global warming denier"; I am a global warming skeptic, especially the claim that it is anthropomorphic. Be that as it may, reducing pollution always is something that is in our own enlightened self-interest but it must be balanced against the potential costs. You see, the only way to eliminate anthropomorphic generated pollution is to eliminate the anthro part of the equation. You possibly can reduce some of the pollution, but pretty much anything that humans do is going to create some pollution ... actually, just by existing we humans pollute the planet.



With 7 billion and increasing, humans are in a fix. Why? Because most of the world lives in what Americans would perceive as abject poverty and those people aspire, for the most part, to bring their standards of living up to something equivalent to what they see on their mass media. The problem with that is that is that it takes energy to do that, and lots and lots and lots of energy.



Unfortunately for the world, most people get that needed energy from evil, polluting, carbon-based sources. Yes, there are other ways to generate energy, but unfortunately - for various and sundry reasons, at least to my knowledge - they are either unacceptable or just not ready for the major leagues yet (or in many ways, dependent on our carbon-based energy sources to be created).



I just wonder how many people these adherents to crushing the carbon-energy-based world want to die, because they will die when the distribution systems collapse for the lack of fuel, and manufacturing economies die because of lack of raw materials and energy. But that will not be my problem as I probably will die before it becomes a problem for my neck of the woods.



The second thing in that article that really disturbed me was way down at the end when it said that President Obama told the Chinese leadership that the US would not intervene in any of China's territorial disputes with its neighbors in the South China Sea. Does anyone remember how the US got itself involved in the Korean War or the First Persian Gulf War (aka Desert Shield/Desert Storm)? Well, I do.



For those who don't remember, in 1950, the Truman Administration made the announcement that the Korean peninsula was outside the areas of American interest ... and the North Koreans promptly invaded the South. In 1990, the Bush I administration essentially told Saddam Hussein that US would not intervene in its border dispute with Kuwait and the Iraqis promptly invaded. OOOPSIE!



Now, President Obama is telling the Chinese that its disputes with our friends and allies who border the South China Sea that we will not intervene to assist them as we are obligated to do by treaty in some cases. Now, you can argue the wisdom of said treaties, but they do exist and saying that we are no longer interested in supporting our friends in the area, well ... that does not engender a lot of trust in the US ... not that most of them trust all that much anyway, given the fickleness of of American leadership.



Still, these things bother me. I can't do anything about them, except maybe express my concern and vent those concerns here.